Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quil Lemons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Quil Lemons

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I do not see how any of this. shows notability, under WP:creative of any other guideline. The first person to photograph a lead image for Vanity Fa r is not necessarily notable, all the more so the first person of any particular group.

All 3 refs are promotional interviews, where he says what he pleases. The similarities between them indicate the same likely PR source--nothing in any one of them is reliable, let alone for ablp.

One of the refs does refer to an item in a show at MOMA--if he isis the permaenent collection, we would be notable. Perhaps that can be shown.  DGG ( talk ) 08:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - Article contains reliable sources that should not be erroneously classified as promotional, and a Google search turns up many more readily available RSes. Gamaliel  ( talk ) 15:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Many reliable sources can be found through Google search such as NYTimes, Philadelphia Inquirer, Vanity Fair, Vogue etc. Article has improvement opportunities. Mommmyy (talk) 20:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.