Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quincy Larson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quincy Larson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Part of a self-confessed advertising campaign given the heavy contributions by company employees or people who are otherwise connected, it's only something a closely-involved person would show, and searches mirrored the trivial sources, so there's no other convincing substance for our non-negotiable policies; all sources offered are clear business announcements, mentions, quoted business words, etc. None of that counters our non-negotiable policies against advertising and merely stating "He's important" or "His business knows him" is not a convincing defense. See:
 * 1 is his own website
 * 2 is his own website again
 * 3 is his own published words again
 * 4 is company website
 * 5 is his own website again
 * 6 is same
 * That violates our simplest policies since it's all published and republished company information, and before anyone asks, this is all I found because (regardless of publication), they all actually maintain the same PR consistency. SwisterTwister   talk  22:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG - Article doesn't establish notability. Article lacks independent reliable sources. Even the article creator acknowledged that the subject isn't notable beyond founding the freeCodeCamp.com website. Notability is not inherited .Previous PROD removed by WP:SPA with no reason given. Google searches turn up nothing to establish notability.   CBS 527 Talk 04:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Disclosure: I'm the author of this article, and also a student of freeCodeCamp, hence connected. I created this article with best intentions, but I was uncertain if the subject meets the notability criteria right from the start. The most relevant information has already been copied into the freeCodeCamp article. I don't consider it a loss of any relevant information if this article is deleted. Googling Quincy Larson podcast shows Larson has attracted some media interest from specialized tech podcasts in the recent past, but I don't think that this is enough to establish encyclopedic relevance. --Jan Schreiber (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Edit 12 February - Note to Closer: If this article is deleted, it could be made a redirect to freeCodeCamp, as suggested by MusikAnimal in the AfD discussion about freeCodeCamp. --Jan Schreiber (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - I am unable to find significant coverage of this individual in reliable, independent publications. I see the organisation he founded has survived AfD, and any useful content in this article can be merged there. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:PROMO that fails GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 19:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.