Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinlivitarianism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. I know, it's early, but this is a very clear case. Friday (talk) 17:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Quinlivitarianism
Joke religion invented in 2005. Needless to say, Google's never heard of it. Does it fail WP:V more than it fails WP:NOR? Could it be a hoax, or perhaps even silly vandalism? You, dear voter, may decide.  As for me, I say we should risk the wrath of Quinlivit and delete. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 01:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. PJM 01:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's a hoax. worthawholebean talkcontribs 02:01, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete-No joke, or hoax, but a budding cult. It's something small at Bradley University, and growing.  trueromantic talkcontribs 04:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Velvetsmog 02:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as silly vandalism. Even if its real "something small at Bradley University" does not meet WP:Importance. It requires reliable third party sources before I would support retention. Capitalistroadster 02:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and add to Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense, I got a kick out of it at least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.176.97.31 (talk • contribs) 2005-12-05 03:22:05 UTC
 * One student has made up a religion about another student. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day.  As is so often the case, the article cites no sources.  I couldn't find any sources when I looked for some.  This article is unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G 03:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:Importance and WP:V. - Mgm|(talk) 11:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is about as non-notable as it gets. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 12:39, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete vandalism (hoax); failing that delete per Complete bollocks. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 15:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete: Vandal hoax. It was just a general delete until all the scribbling above.  Geogre 17:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.