Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quintain(5lines)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Quintain(5lines)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article is simply a dictionary definition in contravention of WP:NOT, and without scope for expansion gråb whåt you cån (talk) 09:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment The article is unsource, improperly titled, and the content wrong.Curb Chain (talk) 11:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I've fixed the content to reflect the facts (Quintain is not a poetic form, but appears to be a catch-all term for any poetic form having five lines). It can probably be sourced, and the title fixed to Quintain (poetry), but the central problem remains: There's really nothing to be added beyond the dictionary definition. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep and redirect to Quintain (poetry). Assuming outcome of Articles for deletion/Quintain (poetry) will be Keep. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete- there is no content that is not already at Quintain (poetry) so there is nothing to be accomplished by merging, and the title is a very implausible search term. Reyk  YO!  01:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as implausible search term. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 18:23, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's a duplicate of Quintain (poetry) and an unlikely redirect. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - unlikely search term. --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:07, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.