Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quix*o*tic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Quix*o*tic

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely WP:NN band. One release on KRS doesn't pass WP:BAND. Toddst1 (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 15:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage is this. Fails WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 18:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Quixotic +Billotte gives over 1000 hits on Google. There was a UK release and international recognition. Band was brief but vital player in DC Riot Grrrl scene, containing - as well as the Billotte sisters - guitarist Mick Barr. It is not a practical candidate for a merge since it contained 3 notable musicians who didn't otherwise play with each other. Wwwhatsup (talk) 06:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Christina Billotte is notable, (currently at afd that will close keep Articles for deletion/Christina Billotte without relying on Quix*o*tic). I see no suggestion Mick Barr is not notable. That's two independently notable members. The band have done something solid themselves (Kill Rock Stars release) so keep. Duffbeerforme (talk) 16:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 15:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Band had notable musicians, one of the notability criteria.--Pink Bull (talk) 15:43, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Two notable band members as Duffbeerborme notes (and his prediction was correct; the AfD on Billotte was closed as a "keep"), plus meets criterion 1.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.