Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiz (clothing)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Can't be bothered to argue this one, looks like it would end keep anyway. (non-admin closure) &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  21:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quiz (clothing)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. I did a WP:BEFORE and although there lots of mentions on google, there is no significant in depth coverage in multiple independent sources, as is required in CORPDEPTH. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade; &sect; ( Message ) -  20:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Keep For the record, I disagreed with on a recent deletion discussion and so he has gone through my articles creations and nominated four for deletion in the last hour - he can't even have had time to do a proper WP:BEFORE on them all. I'm hoping his harassment will stop so I have time to research properly myself before I fully comment. This company has 250 branches in the UK, is on most high streets of a reasonable size - the article needs work, yes, but it is notable and there are already reliable sources in the article, it will benefit from more. WP:NEGLECT is not a reason for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, obviously, given the clearly reliably sourced scope of the company. bd2412  T 21:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.