Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiz no Hoshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. czar 21:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Quiz no Hoshi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable video game. ... disco spinster   talk  00:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  00:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  00:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: Draftify: Seems a little bitey to WP:PROD the article less than ten minutes after creation. Maybe give them time to add references first rather than immediately trying to get rid of it? Since the game obviously exists, it's only polite to give the creator time to fix it. They seem to be pretty new here. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 01:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed. If it was a PROMO article, that'd be different, but this game is well out-of-print. Perhaps the author has sources in mind. Perhaps they had sources in mind, but have now been discouraged by the instant prod. ApLundell (talk) 01:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Draftify per comments by ApLundell and Nihonjoe. Haleth (talk) 01:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I did a little cleanup on the article. It's not much, but it's what I can do right now. Finding exact refs for those reviews will take time as they would have all been in print, not online. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 01:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify WP:PAPERONLY applies here, it should be given a chance to have sources.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is not a single mention in presently available sources and Archive.org shows mere sales lists, not editorial features. It is unlikely that PAPERONLY will save this. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 21:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * How confident are you that Archive org's search engine has correctly made the text of Japanese-language print resources searchable? Because the sources would be in Japanese. ApLundell (talk) 04:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Draftify for now as per above comments. If not sources are found in the next 6 months, it can be G13'd.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:12, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.