Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quoted For Truth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge. Petros471 19:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Quoted For Truth
Non-notable internet neologism and dicdef; fails both the criterias of WP:NEO and WP:WINAD guidelines.--TBC TaLk?!? 03:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable Somerset219 04:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Dicdef, and no hope of ever becoming more. Resolute 04:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, and neologism. *~Daniel~* ☎ 05:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Slight merge to List of Internet phenomena. —Quarl (talk) 2006-08-10 07:06Z 
 * Merge to list of internet slang. I see it used everywhere: its quite common.  But it sure as heck doesn't deserve its own article. &mdash;   Da rk Sh ik ar i   talk /contribs  10:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Quarl and Dark Shikari. About the only purpose I can see for an article here is to explain what the acronym QFT means in this context.  Once you know what it stands for, it's self-explanatory.  Smerdis of Tlön 14:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge if some other article wants this, per what everyone above said --Xyzzyplugh 14:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Kill it, no redirect. It isn't worthy of an article, but could be at home as 10 words on a listing of acronyms in use online... -- Xinit 21:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge with redirect. It is used all the time, the first time I saw it used I looked it up here, and I recently directed someone here to explain its use. This article serves a valid purpose, and it isn't like the 2k of space its taking up is hurting anyone. stufff 02:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Internet slang phrases per Dark Shikari. Owoc 12:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.