Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qur'an desecration by US detainees

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Eugene van der Pijll 19:28, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Qur'an desecration by US detainees
Yet another limp fork of Qur'an desecration controversy of 2005 (see also Votes for deletion/Qur'an desecration at Guantánamo Bay). This is part of a binge of creating new articles, renaming the original article again and again and generally messing around with the content, in an apparent attempt to further a POV. --Lee Hunter 16:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete and Redirect to Qur'an desecration controversy of 2005 --Irishpunktom\talk 16:45, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. With or without Jack the Ripper or Adolf Hitler, people commit suicide. Generally, if you kill yourself, that's your own business. But homicide is a different matter. If I were a detainee. I can use my copy of Qu'ran to do whatever I want to do as long as it does not cause any trouble. It is a completely different matter if U.S. military personnels take that copy of Qu'ran from a defenseless and unprotected detainees and do something to it. -- Toytoy 17:32, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NoPuzzleStranger 17:33, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not redirect. Neutralitytalk 18:41, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV fork. JamesBurns 23:39, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or make sure that the main article reflects the truth that most of the abuse of the Qur'an has been by the detainees (terrorists). Otherwise, the article would be nothing more than POV America-bashing and would warrant deletion. Capitalistroadster 00:24, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. -Sean Curtin 01:02, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV fork. RickK 05:36, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no "documentation" of allegedly "documented" accussations. Ejrrjs | What? 06:34, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and recreate as a redirect to Qur'an desecration controversy of 2005. NatusRoma 07:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsubstantiated gibberish and POV. Kaibabsquirrel 23:32, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, unless there is clear and reliable agreement that reported acts of Qur'an desecration which US detainees are accused of, will go in the Qur'an desecration controversy of 2005 article. It was only because csloat and toytoy refused to allow this info to be included, that I created the Qur'an desecration by US detainees sidebare article. If there's a merge, then a REDIRECT is better than having 2 articles. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 19:55, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Ed you're misrepresenting what happened on the Qur'an desecration controversy of 2005 article. Nobody - certainly not I - "refused" to allow this information into the article; my only objection was to making it the focus of the article by emphasizing it in the introduction.  The information is in the article as you can verify yourself.--csloat 23:42, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this article; it appears to have been created simply to prove a point. As noted above, the point itself is based on a misinterpretation of the discussion.
 * Delete -- Viajero | Talk 13:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .