Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quran and Thinking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:49, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Quran and Thinking

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Personal interpretation of scripture, OR and a POV fork. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 15:49, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. @SmithAndTeam (talk) 15:53, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * delete as it stands: there are no refs, and no hint this is covered by any outside sources; without those, this is indeed as the proposer says William M. Connolley (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I believe this is created in good faith but without an understanding of our policies. So far as I can see, this is not a subject that is discussed in reliable sources and thus doesn't meet our notability criteria. Dougweller (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - unreferenced as above; quotes from the Quran without additional citations make this WP:OR and/or WP:SYNTH. Main Quran article already has sections for discussion of interpretation and significance. Dialectric (talk) 18:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As WP:OR. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per all above.--Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:25, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * No delete::: The article has been modified and References have been added. I hope that the article is now in conform with Wikipedia policy. Thanks.Mn-imhotep (talk) 09:26, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The references provided are insufficient. It is still unclear why this should be a separate article from Quran, see Content forking. The bulk of the article is still direct quotes from the Quran, so issues of WP:OR remain.Dialectric (talk) 14:35, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. In particular, this is a little more than a personal essay.  Throwing in two offline citations about minor points in the essay does not turn it into a notable topic, it makes it a synthesis. Bearian (talk) 22:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. Per nom and Bearian. Circumspect (talk) 01:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a personal essay.  Automatic Strikeout  ( T •  C) 21:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.