Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quran miracle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was obvious snow delete. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 17:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Quran miracle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Hard to figure exactly how to categorize this as anything else than original research. Drmies (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Original, unreferenced numerology research. Cullen328 (talk) 22:34, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, lol original research. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 22:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Textbook example of original research. Edward321 (talk) 00:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - wow, pure original research is it.  Lady  of  Shalott   01:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and all of above. The sources only confirm this is original research. 99.170.154.183 (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Do not delete as the information is not original research but an english version of Abdullah Jalghoom's work. There are external links and reference to his book in the article. humtv (talk) 15:24, 9 July 2011 (GMT)
 * Comment No evidence that this is a reliable source. Above comment is user's only contribution. 99.170.154.183 (talk) 15:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Do not delete This research has already been done in Arabic .The wikipedia article is just an english translation of a 5 to 10 years old work in Arabic. Quran Information (talk) )  —Preceding undated comment added 15:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC).
 * Has the research been published in or been the subject of multiple reliable sources, per WP:RELIABLE? 99.170.154.183 (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes it has been published, the url is http://www.alargam.com/sorts/jalghoom/index.htm and http://www.alargam.com/sorts/jalghoom/8/asrar/index.htm where the whole book is available online in Arabic Quran Information (talk) 16:32, 9 July 2011 (GMT)
 * When I go to that website and use Google Translate, it appears to be Abdullah Jalghoom's own website. That is not an independent reliable source.  Websites controlled by the person who wrote the book and/or developed the concept do not establish notability on Wikipedia.  We need references to discussion of this topic in independent reliable sources.  Cullen328 (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.