Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QxOrm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is to delete the panda ₯’  10:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

QxOrm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no evidence at all that this satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. There are no independent sources cited in the article, and a Google search produced various pages at www.qxorm.com, qt-apps.org etc, download sites, the Wikipedia article, forum posts, a bug report, etc, but nothing that could remotely be considered as substantial coverage in an independent source. The article has twice before been deleted, once speedily and once by PROD. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  12:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - I'm a little out of depth here as I'm not really a programmer, but glancing at this QxOrm seems like an important part of C++, which is a major programming language. Googling provides lots of relevant links, though I'm having trouble find higher quality RS on the subject. NickCT (talk) 13:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:B2B: the article does not describe the software itself – it merely provides short description of its genre immediately followed by the example creep. WP:RED may serve a good basis for deletion if independent reliable sources covering this topic in sufficient detail are found. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.