Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qxl.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 04:53, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

qxl.com
obvious advertisement ("click here to view our...")
 * Delete per nomination ☢ Ҡieff⌇↯ 02:31, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete copyvioesque advertisement. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 02:35, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Copyvio - this is a press release from the QXL website. Pilatus 02:57, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: If it's really a press release, those are generally intended to be copyright-free; otherwise, newspaper couldn't easily reprint them. &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Press releases are generally intended to be copied widely for the purpose of writing news reports. That hardly qualifies as "copyright-free" or "public domain". --Carnildo 23:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete adv. -- NS LE  ( Commu nicate! ) < Contribs > 09:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 *  Extremely strong delete. It's not a press release, it's an info page, so it's a copyvio.  (This should be on WP:CP, but leaving it on AfD or taking it there does not influence my decision.)  --Wcquidditch | Talk 21:14, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Blatant advert. Prashanthns 16:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.