Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R&B Punk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was procedural close, article completely rewritten with sources. This does not prejudice a later AfD. Sandstein 07:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

R&amp;B Punk

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to be a neologism; note that it's an unreferenced orphan, and was created almost exactly a year ago. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 08:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V. --Brewcrewer (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Article is clearly in better shape. --Brewcrewer (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable pseudo-genre.--Michig (talk) 09:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Coudant find anything about it on a quick google search.  Tiddly - Tom  09:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Much to my surprise, I actually found some sources on this from Google Books. As the article is headed for deletion, I'm going to blow it up and start from scratch with the sources I've found. Don't know if it'll save it, but I'll give it a go. faithless   (speak)  10:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.