Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Réseau des écoles démocratiques au Québec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In the three weeks this has been open, no significant treatment of the topic in reliable sources has been adduced to rebut the "delete" arguments. Deor (talk) 14:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Réseau des écoles démocratiques au Québec

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Copied and pasted from a then-unreviewed AfC draft, I am unable to find sources which meet WP:CORP / WP:CORPDEPTH that provide in-depth, arm's length coverage of this organization. j⚛e deckertalk 06:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * delete the sources provided are not even about the subject but Quebec educational legislation. LibStar (talk) 11:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources about the organization... Zeus t&#124; u &#124; c 22:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

That's true, I'm new, but the reference problem has been fixed.
 * Sourced I have added 3 sources that discuss the organization, links 5,6,7. User talk:Salvorisen 21:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I have found another source, here it is http://jual.nipissingu.ca/NewIssue/v8164.pdf . User talk:Marcinoneword 4:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added the academic source as per Marcinoneword, reference 8. User talk:Salvorisen 12:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Might become notable enough, but I can't say it is at present--what the article is however is advocacy, plain and simple. The same rules apply as to advertising, regardless of our sympathies. The only [possibly neutral reference is the article in Journal of Unschooling and Alternative Learning, but it is unfortunaely an article about one particular school, with not a single word about this network. Have Marcinoneword  and Salvorisen actually read it?  DGG ( talk ) 20:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.