Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Résumé candidate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Résumé candidate

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unencyclopedic political term with no references or good sources that I could find. The phrase only returns 22,000 Google hits, most related to job searches. Finally, the content of the article is deeply subjective. --BDD (talk) 23:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 23:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 23:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. & WP:NOR.--JayJasper (talk) 16:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. & WP:NOR. Yworo (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - this is encyclopedic, in the sense that a sourced article could be created. Whether the term is notable is another issue.  FWIW, the nom uses a bit of nonsense to say "only 22,000" Ghits. Perhaps it just needs WP:TNT. Bearian (talk) 19:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. A search through GNews archives suggests that the term has had some currency; for example, it was used with some frequency in connection with the first President Bush.  It's not clear to me, however, whether there's anything to say about the term beyond the fact that it's used.--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.