Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ròstemwu Palace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. The article is a blatant hoax so falls under WP:CSD. Additionally, the sole author of the article requested deletion by adding a db-author tag. Mz7 (talk) 02:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Ròstemwu Palace

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possible hoax, Bellun and Fuland yields no Google results. Neither does Rostemwu Palace, King Ota II or Cądytći Rołazya architect. Sources are all invalid. lovkal (talk) 08:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The images in the article are not legitimate, as they are photos of other palaces, such as the Palace of Kozłówka. lovkal (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Definitely a hoax. Everything in the article is fake, and the names are apparently invented by someone who is not a native speaker of Polish. c:file:Ròstemwu Palace Front.jpg, uploaded by the same author, should be handled as well – it's a photo of the Kozłówka Palace. I can't access the Flickr to verify its copyright. No such user (talk) 09:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:01, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Hoax. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.