Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rīga-Herson-Astrakhan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 20:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Rīga-Herson-Astrakhan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 18:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * 1) Lack of notability. According to the referenced source, a relatively short notice dated 2009.03.27 at the Dienas Business internet portal (db.lv), the company was only registered this week with a founding capital of 700,000 Latvian lats.
 * 2) The project lacks legal status in the countries mentioned: "Tiesa, biedrībai ir jācenšas panākt atbalsts referendumā, lai šādu projektu virzītu. Pie tam, ne vien Latvijā, bet arī Ukrainā, Krievijā un Baltkrievijā. Tā ir viens no daudzajiem iemesliem, kas liek nozares ekspertiem skatīties uz šo projektu ar neticību." Translation: "For certain, the company must work hard for (governmental) referendum support, to bring this project on track. Furthermore, not only in Latvia, but also in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus. This is one of many reasons, that makes experts within the field look at this project in disbelief."
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.
 * Delete It lacks indepth coverage from sources not related to the subject. In short, it lacks notability as per nom. --Russavia Dialogue 18:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This project is not started yet. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.DonaldDuck (talk) 09:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - lacking independent WP:RS, and to avoid WP:CRYSTAL. If/when it actually gets built, it would probably be notable. Rd232 talk 15:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.