Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R-Mean (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  So Why  08:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

R-Mean
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:MUSIC, no reliable secondary coverage or releases on notable labels. Tone is somewhat promotional. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete 31 references and none meets WP:RS, which is weirdly impressive. Sources are either promotional, e.g., music downloads, PR Web, forum posts, record labels, etc. or not significant, e.g., album announcements, track listings, etc. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.