Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R-theory of time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  00:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

R-theory of time
Vanity article promoting the theories of a doctoral student named Jeffrey Grupp. I'm completing this nomination, as it was orphaned for some reason (original nomination dated December 2 below). Delete Wile E. Heresiarch


 * I nominated this article for deletion. I had previously added the cleanup tag and POV Check tags and discussed why on the article's talk page.  However as it is written, it seems very pov and has only a single webpage as a source.  So until it is cleaned up, it seems to much like original research, and so therefore my vote is Delete.TheRingess 22:17, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per User:TheRingess. Non-notable pseudoscience. &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr;&#x9F9C; 2005-12-11 07:34:08Z
 * Delete vanity. The referenced article was just published. Gazpacho 09:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for vanity. Publishing theories of time in Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies doesn't provide proper peer review. Rasmus (talk) 12:43, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - theories of the universe that rely on philosophy and religion rather than science have no place in an encyclopedia. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 20:17, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: I disagree strongly with Cyde but this is original research, not someone's religious belief. Ashibaka tock 23:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Croat Canuck 02:40, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.