Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R.L Weeks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

R.L Weeks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of passing WP:GNG or WP:BIO. PROD removed by author. RA 0808 talkcontribs 19:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:AUTHOR, at present. Have had a look for press sources and I can't find the required "significant critical attention", it seems to be at the level of Goodreads and Amazon reader reviews at the moment. --McGeddon (talk) 19:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 03:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 04:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Weeks exists as an author, but this by itself does not give notability and she'd need to have received coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspaper articles or reviews on websites that Wikipedia would see as a RS. I just don't see where she's achieved this at this point in time. I'm aware that it's difficult for indie authors to gain coverage, but it is required. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Self-published author with no coverage in reliable sources. Kolbasz (talk) 08:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - run of the mill writer who has not garnered any press, from what I can see. If somebody finds anything, please ping me. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing here at all for any actual convincing notability. SwisterTwister   talk  23:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.