Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. G. Law Associates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

R. G. Law Associates

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Notability not established by citations, article bordering on spam WWGB 10:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as written. Being the 14th largest law firm in Pakistan might be said to be notability of a sort, but it needs a better article than that, and some reliable sources would be nice too. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  11:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless article is adequately sourced.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability. JJL 19:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Substantial coverage in multiple, independent and reliable sources is needed to establish notability. A single mention in a trade magazine doesn't qualify. Also, existence of even that is questionable--the creator of this article once cited a non-existent IMDb page as evidence of his own notability for a now-deleted article about himself. Nick Graves 15:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.