Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. J. Pradip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:52, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

R. J. Pradip

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:GNG, WP:TOOSOON, WP:Promotional, subject has no contribution to the field they claim to be. Queer Eco feminist [they/them/their] 15:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Queer Eco feminist [they/them/their] 15:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Queer Eco feminist [they/them/their] 15:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Borderline speedy/self-promotion. Zero reliable sources with any significant coverage about the subject. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 16:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Looks like WP:REFBOMB in an attempt to appear notable. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't qualify WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG now there are thousands of a journalists not clear why the subject is notable upcoming a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.