Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. L. Brooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. He's already covered in the main article. Mackensen (talk) 10:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

R. L. Brooks

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

'''Delete: Non-notable, unreferenced, trivial. Dudleydooright 11:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Eh. Other bands' individuals get separate pages. I suppose if the band is notable, the guy can have a page too. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 13:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Merge with Flee the Seen unless more verifiable info can be added to this article. Members of bands notable enough to have articles are probably notable enough to have own articles but the lack of info suggests it should be merged.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The guy, the band and the label all seem non-notable. It's a local band, getting some gigs locally opening for touring bands. That's nothing special. The label was created by a guy in a band. Nothing special. There are no citations for the claim of sales. Googling R.L. Brooks gets this article and then other people. MarkBul 14:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Flee the Seen, and only because I couldn't come up with a good excuse to keep. mobyrock 23:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable Mbisanz 01:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.