Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. N. Shetty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Snow and Speedy Keep (nominator !voted keep) &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

R. N. Shetty

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

R. N. Shetty a.k.a Rama N. Shetty a businessman from Hubli does not meet WP:BIO, no such thing is evident from the page that this person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific fieldkaeiou (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

controversy --kaeiou (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. some non trivial (like this ) and lots of mentions in English mainstream media. If he gets this many hits in English Gnews it is likely he would have been covered more widely in Kannada and Tulu media.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Bangalore University don't confer honorary doctorate to persons who are not notable.  Arjun  024  08:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * comment there was a controversy on this -
 * Keep. You only need to read the first few of the Google News archive search results spoon-fed above to see that the subject is notable. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment How significant is Visvesvarayya's award given to others? Is it like a fellow of some Academy in India? Visvesvarayya is Bharat Ratna recepient. --kaeiou (talk) 03:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Google search and news search shows that he is a notable person worthy of inclusion in this encyclopedia. Rabbabodrool (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep But the section Family should probably go. (User) Mb (Talk) 12:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep close this please. My fault. Thanks.--kaeiou (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.