Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Sundaravadivelu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

R. Sundaravadivelu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SELFPROMOTE...Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. GS h-index of 12 is too low for WP:Prof. WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete actually as I had removed the Speedy since there was at least a Royal Society membership but, by searching, I am unable to find anything else better, no significant citations or library collections which is not at all surprising here. SwisterTwister   talk  00:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think being a fellow of what appears to be his country's main academy of engineering, the Indian National Academy of Engineering (search his name here) is enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * INAE appoints up to 50 fellows from academia, industry and government every year. I don't think we can have an article for all of them just because of that membership. It doesn't satisfy WP:PROF. If it is then we are opening a Pandora's box...Rameshnta909 (talk) 09:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * There are a number of academies in India. Not all of them are as worthy as others. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC).

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr  \ talk / 02:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.