Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. T. Crowley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; neuro(talk) 22:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

R. T. Crowley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

a) Subject does not appear to be notable; b) Appears to be self-promotion: the substantial edits came from an IP in Cary, NC (network:Organization;I:RESEARCH-TRIANGLE-SOFTWARE), very similar to his company, Research Triangle Commerce. Specious (talk) 20:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep A Google search shows that Crowley is the author of some key texts in the EDI area, and occupies or has occupied some key positions in industry trade groups. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Needs to be referenced. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per new Businessweek source and comments by WikiDan61. - Mgm|(talk) 11:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep-even if it needs to be referenced, expanded-heck, even if it needs to be rewritten- the topic looks notable enough for a keep. Cheers.  Im per a t § r (Talk) 17:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep-Needs to be rewritten and much better sourced, but the sources are available:   Typically goes by "Bob Crowley" --Macrowiz (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.