Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Tam sessions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Shanel 00:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

R. Tam sessions
Duplicates material found in the article for the film Serenity and has little chance of growing further. Delete and redirect. - EurekaLott 04:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 06:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom. really trivial. psch  e  mp  |  talk  06:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP. I am planning to expand this beyond what belongs in the Serenity article. The Wookieepedian 09:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: Googling "R. Tam sessions" brings up 1,250,000 results.The Wookieepedian 10:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: when googling you need to use quotes or you get tons of unrelated hits. With quotes ~600 hits.
 * Keep, fairly notable aspect of the unique Serenity marketing campaign. Actually has lots of room for expansion. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 14:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I suggest a new strategy: Let The Wookiepedian Win. -- Ruby  14:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm also saying keep it, since I came by more or less at random and would've probably missed it on the main Firefly page. Need expansion/completion thou. --rotane 22:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as it appears to be independently notable. --Karnesky 23:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Just spent the past 30 minutes reading up on this from the links. Deserves it's on page. --Wynler | Talk 17:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, assuming completion. -b 06:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, though I'd like to see some WP-reliable sources. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 07:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I LIKE the idea of letting the Wookiepedian win. &mdash; CJewell (talk to me) 20:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Wookiepedian. --Vanis314 2:52 25 Feburary 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as it is a rather notable part of the Firefly machine, as well as a little piece of work onto itself. --Bacteria 19:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.