Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Y. Deshpande


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 13:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

R. Y. Deshpande

 * – ( View AfD View log )

His page was set Orphan on June 2010 and made not notable on Feb 2010 by someone (not me). He is a nuclear physicist and also Sri Aurobindo follower. We do not see him qualified for wikipedia notable title as a physicist, nor as a notable author on his books on Aurobindo. His numbers in Google scholar are low on his books and research publications 0ukieu (talk) 21:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Do not get confused - There are many with this name. The 1st entry on Google scholar is not this person R. Y. Deshpande under consideration. Does anyone know what R stands for? It looks like R Y Deshpande and Mangesh V. Nadkarni worked together in Pondicheri in Aurobindo Ashram. Nadkarni is the one I nominated for deletion but lost it. 0ukieu (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not make it as a scientist. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

--0ukieu (talk) 00:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Peter Heehs also writes on Aurobindo, but I suppose he does not hold a Ph.D. where as RY has. 0ukieu (talk) 23:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

0ukieu (talk) 17:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment looks like who cares for wiki notability. Does not make any sense it is there or not . I shoud stop deleteing or creating pages. 0ukieu (talk) 17:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF and WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * delete per DE. Nergaal (talk) 18:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.