Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R/IAmA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

R/IAmA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

R/AmItheAsshole was deleted (see Articles for deletion/R/AmItheAsshole). it is very similar to this. There is not much significant coverage about it, and the few pieces written about it are not enough to meet WP:GNG. This is because they are not independent of the subject. The vast majority of them are because a famous person decided to host an AMA. This is not independent of the subject. The subreddit itself is not notable. The people who post on it sometimes are. This fails GNG.  I-82-I &#124;  TALK  07:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I disagree with the nominator's analysis/arguments. CapnZapp (talk) 16:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think this particular subreddit is significant and passes WP:GNG, thinking about things like  . And I do not agree that the influence and visibility of the people who appear in AMAs is separate from, and not indicative of, the subreddit's notability. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.