Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R2-D2: Beneath the Dome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

R2-D2: Beneath the Dome

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No one is as surprised as I am that there are no reliable sources that attest to the notability of this film. Star Wars and R2-D2 are unquestionably notable subjects but their notability is not inherited by the film. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NF. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 11:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Wow. Legitimate LucasFilm Star Wars-related release and no good sources. Talk about a Wikipedian geek nightmare :) I went through the first 6 pages of Google hits and have to agree there's almost nothing other than the following [pretty terrible] sources. Unless someone can find better I'd have to agree with nom. --Rhododendrites (talk) 13:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 1 paragraph on io9
 * Alex's 10-Word Movie Reviews
 * official presence on Starwars.com
 * 1 paragraph on dvdjournal
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.