Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R204DESIGN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Soft delete - undeletion may be requested at WP:REFUND. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 15:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

R204DESIGN

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable per WP:CORPDEPTH. WP should for very notable companies (whatever that is) rather than each and every run of the mill companies. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:24, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:37, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 00:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - judging by the complete lack of anything online (apart from a couple of press releases) about the company or its work, it seems to have made no impact at the moment! Sionk (talk) 01:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.