Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R204DESIGN (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

R204DESIGN
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was resurrected from a 'soft' post-AfD deletion in January, but hasn't been subsequently improved. I can't find any evidence of notability and I don't think the awards listed are particularly important. I found one of the listed 'Publications' and it turned out not to be about R204DESIGN, in fact ascribing one of R204DESIGN's alleged projects to another designer. On that basis I'm not sure I can trust anything in the article! This company has been formed and active during the internet age, therefore one would expect to find multiple examples of coverage about their achievements if they were notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Sionk (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  19:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  19:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. The achievements listed in the article do not add up to much, and the references are not to Reliable Sources. My search of Google News Archive found nothing to suggest notability. --MelanieN (talk) 16:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:CORP. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, no significant coverage found in non-primary reliable sources, does not meet notability requirements as defined by WP:GNG; support deletion.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.