Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R718 (South Africa)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

R718 (South Africa)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Failed Verification; neither GPS nor the document we cite in every South African Road Article (i.e. South African Route Description & Destination Analysis) proves that this "Route Number" is in use in South Africa. GeographicAccountant (talk) 12:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Concur that this fails verification - the road is not listed in the official RDDA document, does not appear on any of the major mapping platforms, and looking on Google Streetview the road isn't signed as such. I can't find any source to support it. - htonl (talk) 20:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Rschen7754 01:06, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment/delete I couldn’t find any sources, so would lean towards a delete, but the “hole” in the route numbering scheme is weird, and the description of the road would put it in the described area if it did exist.Park3r (talk)
 * Delete Per nom. fails verification. NMasiha (talk) 18:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.