Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RASCargO (cargo screening system)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:00, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

RASCargO (cargo screening system)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article was written by a non-neutral editor, and it does not appear to be notable - little to nothing is written about it in reliable secondary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dohn joe (talk • contribs)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  05:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - apparent WP:COI, apparent copyright problems, WP:ADVERTISING, lack of secondary sources. Haus Talk 14:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm finding extemely tangential/weak coverage in WP:RS. There might something out there to warrant an article, but the current one is pretty unsalvageably spammy and would likely have to be WP:TNTed. -- Kinu  t/c 14:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of wp:notability. One source is their own web site, the other has nothing about them. No content worth saving with possible notability in mind.   The whol earticle looks like their sales brochure pasted into a Wikpedia page. North8000 (talk) 22:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.