Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RAVAGE (rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   "delete." --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 20:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

RAVAGE (rapper)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. Reads like an self-aggrandizing advertisement. External links read like self-written, self-aggrandizing diatribes with no real content or assertion of notability. Self-label doesn't help the notability search. This wikipedia page is little more than an advertisement, and a look at the history ("Ravagenrumble" + "64.191.211.54" are all but 9 edits, and of those 8, 4 are bots, 1 is PROD.) will strengthen that belief. "I must be famous; I have a page on Wikipedia!" ... or not. VengeancePrime (talk) 23:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 23:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 00:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 00:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Were there an independent link to back up the alleged critical acclaim of his remix, I would be inclined to keep the article. However, I'm not convinced that there is verifiable demonstration that the criteria at WP:MUSIC are met. —C.Fred (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira (talk) 19:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.