Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RBCD Performance Plus, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

RBCD Performance Plus, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has been around since 2006 but appears to have no viable claim to notability other than that it appears to sell ammunition which is not all it is cracked up to be. If all companies that mis-sell their products were deemed notable, we would be inundated here. The refs give no credible sense of any notability and only one seemed to mention the company. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 23:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Concur with nom.  No clear claim to notability.  Of the four refs, none appear to offer any in-depth reliable coverage.  Searching find many mentions mostly in various blogs, but still no reliable independent coverage to satisfy WP:CORP. MB 01:52, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I searched on Google and couldn't find any usable sources that talk about the company. The Blended-metal bullets article contains some of the same material, so not much would be lost in the deletion of this article. Felsic2 (talk) 16:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as clear advertising with none of what's listed becoming both substantial information and news, nothing suggests otherwise especially considering the sheer number of several rarely-used accounts involved. SwisterTwister   talk  21:02, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.