Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RBGT 62a


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:NPASR applies. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  05:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

RBGT 62a

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod was removed by author so I am bringing it here. Initially, it had exactly one "reference" - the article simply said "Josef BOGIN, JR." at the bottom. A search found one website where the author even uses all caps just like the "reference" so it appeared to be the article author himself. After the prod was removed, the author added two more "references". One doesn't appear to have anything about the RBGT-62a that I could find, the other is an online store. The whole article is one persons original research and nothing about it illustrates notability. Justeditingtoday (talk) 14:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Seems to have fairly large following in the Geiger counter crew, as a well known cold war Geiger counter. It won't have a huge number of references since it comes from a country from behind the iron curtain. As something that's not run of the mill, and as an artifact of the cold war. Keep. scope_creep (talk) 10:22, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 08:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * keep Plenty of places mentioning, referring to it, or about the device.  d.g. L3X1  (distant write)  23:57, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.