Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RCSCC Victory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Agent 86 00:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

RCSCC Victory

 * — (View AfD)

This is an article describing a sub-unit of a larger national unit that doesn't provide evidence of its individual notability. See WP:ORG Sancho McCann 02:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I would disagree on this one - the article contains several claims to notability. --Brianyoumans 04:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Claims aren't the criteria that articles about organizations need to meet - sufficient notability should be established through reliable and verifiable sources... maybe we should just tag it as needing references then. We'd need to find some third party materials or media coverage to satisfy WP:ORG though. Sancho McCann 05:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - claim of being the first sea cadet corps formed in Canada would distinguish this sub unit from the others, but no reliable sources are citeed. I've tagged with unref. -- Whpq 17:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Whpq. Sharkface217 05:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Whpq. Sancho McCann 06:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.