Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RCTV logos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge. (Meaning I redirect, anyone who cares to can merge from the history.) - brenneman  06:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

RCTV logos
Original research, unverifiable, does not establish subject's notability. See also the AfD discussions for BBC One logos and Logos of Viacom. &mdash;tregoweth (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to RCTV. Why is it unverifiable?  I'm pretty sure such information can be found in the "About us" or "History" section of most major corporate websites.  This is likely a fork of the RCTV article.  However, the length of the two articles does not justify two separate articles. -- Black Falcon 05:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge. Why is it that some people refuse to see the historical aspect of logos? -- azumanga 17:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge onto RCTV. Responding to the nominator, "does not establish subject's notability" isn't a valid argument. RCTV is clearly notable.--Jersey Devil 03:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.