Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RED STAMP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:01, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

RED STAMP

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of outside notability. Fails to meet WP:GNG and, if applicable, WP:ORG (as there's no specific policy on studies or programs, but ORG is broadly construed). Written in first person plural; highly personal/promotional tone; reads like a pamphlet or an "overview" section on a website.  — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler ) 22:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No sources, nor certainty as to whether the program has yet been initiated. Perhaps copied from internal publications. 99.0.80.70 (talk) 22:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  23:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  23:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  23:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find anything to show that this has yet taken place or that it's currently notable. There's always the chance that this research project may eventually become something notable enough to where it's quoted in papers or used as a source in peer-reviewed journals, but it's not notable yet. It's just far WP:TOOSOON to claim notability for this. There are a lot of research projects that never get any notice (academic or otherwise) from outside sources and/or never get past the initial planning stages. It doesn't help that the page is fairly promotional in nature, stating that participants get a free t-shirt and such.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.