Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REPAIR Impact Fund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

REPAIR Impact Fund

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Investment fund lacking significant coverage in independent sources. The page is completely advertorial. Citrivescence (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Citrivescence (talk) 04:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Citrivescence (talk) 04:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete or Complete Rewrite, article is one large advertisement for this fund, and either needs deletion or to be completely rewritten. Jeb3  Talk at me here  12:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Replying to the article creator here since I think you mistakenly replied to me on the talk page. The page was nominated for deletion not just because of the writing style, but also the lack of significant coverage according to WP:GNG. You can feel free to edit the page while the discussion is open here at AfD. Citrivescence (talk) 00:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: This Fund already enjoys a section on the Novo Holdings A/S Entry and I'm not convinced there's enough WP:RS to warrant its own entry at this time; but I do not have access to the FT article. Pegnawl (talk) 14:09, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.