Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RElements


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:00, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

RElements

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

In good faith - possible advertising or non notability? Chaosdruid (talk) 13:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: both advertising and non-notable. This is obvious soliciting of funds --- rElements have experienced an very high growth rate since its foundation. Google News Archive finds only one Experian report and a bunch of typos. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 20:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: From the article "Rafael Gracioso Martins, a young entrepreneur who worked and developed Chemical Vapor Deposition chambers for producing advanced composites...", and the only contributing author is rgmcorp. Coincidence?  I think not.  Blatant self-promotion, in direct contravention of policy.
 * -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 13:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete The lack of independent sources is a strong indication of lack of notability. Edward321 (talk) 14:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.