Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RFID Guardian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

RFID Guardian

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails notability. Describes a single university project but notability not established (nor even attempted). The creator and only significant contributor is called User:RFIDchip and has not contributed to any other pages, indicating a WP:SPA with a WP:COI. Peter Ballard (talk) 11:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's rather necessary and big article. And there is one interwiki-link.--X093i (talk) 15:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC) — X093i (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep Although there is a WP:COI here, I think that the article can be salvaged. It needs to be wiki'd and have all the WP:SPAM portions removed.  I found these sources that could be used.    ...  The technology will, as the years go by, be a part of society and have a definitive impact, in my opinion.  With a re-write, and sources, I feel it passes WP:V and WP:N.  --Pmedema (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - I've no doubt this sort of technology will continue to be important. But the article is not about the technology, it is about a specific product. When you strip away the RFID background stuff (which is already elsewhere) and the COI-loaded product description, there's almost nothing else, perhaps an external link which which could be added to RFID. Peter Ballard (talk) 23:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 07:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I went through the RFID article and this peticular technology/project is unique in what it will do. Funny how things happen... I was driving into work this morning (Toronto) and the radio talk show (AM 1010) was talking about the RFID technology and the "jamming" and "sencing" of the signals.  I'm all for perhaps moving this article to a more appropriate name?  The RFID article is getting pretty big... We could also split the "Security" portion out of that and merge it with this....  Just thinking of ideas.--Pmedema (talk) 13:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google News Archive search shows clear notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and remove spam. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 22:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.