Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RG Properties


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

RG Properties

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Cunning advert: company notability assertion comprises list of celebs who have performed in their facilities. Askari Mark (Talk) 05:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Doesn't assert how WP:CORP is met. --Gwern (contribs) 05:52 14 February 2007 (GMT) 05:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:CORP. Not a listed company, google hits are mostly about other companies.  It is well known and in the press in British Columbia, owns a hockey team and is in construction but those things don't reach the standard.  Although I did some of the editing, (linking) I think it should go. -- KenWalker | Talk 06:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It does assert notability, but fails. --Selket Talk 07:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As per KenWalker.--Keefer4 03:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose I'm not so sure about this; I don't like the overblown list of people who've played facilities operated by or through hosting services by this company (whichever; I should read it more closely but it seems to be somewhat both), but it still seems to have an important profile in the local entertainment-services infrastructure sector. The Washington Group, another holding company and also Orca Bay Entertainment (hmm, maybe I don't have those names right?...I wonder hmmm about Perryscope, which should have an article), are the same kind of fish; not notable in the public eye, but very much so within the economic infrastructure.  I think it needs paring-down, and a less press-release kind of sound, but the ownership of the Victoria hockey team and certain other items in its list of assets/enterprises make it notable, if only on a BC/Victoria level basis.Skookum1 09:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inadequate references; appears to fail WP:CORP. WMMartin 15:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.