Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RHP Multimedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that the article does not have the coverage in reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 18:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

RHP Multimedia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article about a company that doesn't credibly meet guidelines for notability. Article was speeded as Advertisement and Non-notable and re-created with virtually the same content. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done )  13:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Please explain the proper notability. This article was written as an honest submission, modeled after published and approved content on Wikipedia. What should I change about it? Jtechlover (talk) 13:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * A brief follow up to my previous comment. What should I change about it? Jtechlover (talk) 20:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Please note, I have updated the article removing links that might be considered advertising, in accordance with your policies. I hope this is sufficient, thank you. Jtechlover (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relist comment. To Jtechlover - although there are a few different possible reasons to delete a page, the one that seems most relevant here is notability. Specifically, we need to find out whether the company passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines for corporations. To prove that a company passes the guidelines, we need to find significant coverage about it in reliable sources that are independent of the company itself. (See also this simple explanation of the notability guidelines.) — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see anything that can be stretched to meet WP:CORP and I can't find a reliable source that backs up the claim of altering the way that people use their smartphone cameras, etc., which might well denote notability if arm's-length third-party sources that agree explicitly could be provided.  Ubelowme U  Me  15:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No references found to indicate that this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 18:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  GregJackP   Boomer!   05:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.