Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RISCO Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

RISCO Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

no indication of notability. no independent WP:reliable sources. References appear to be to press releases. Contested prod. Google does not provide anything to establish notability. noq (talk) 18:57, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Risco Group, known until 2005 as Rokonet, is one of the largest global security system creators (a competitor of Honeywell's intrusion detection systems). Several press releases are written by authorities in the security systems field. Please let me know which information must be deleted in order to meet Wikipedia's standards and keep the Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.89.132 (talk) 19:27, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only do they provide "solutions", they provide them globally! multinational company providing security solutions for the global market.  The remaining article is devoted to a catalogue of the "solutions" they offer.  Unambiguous advertising and no showing of historical, cultural, or technical significance: not an encyclopedia subject. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are not independant, reliable secondary sources to support this comapny's notability.  The few GNews articles are mainly from a single source and do not provide more than trivial coverage.  To be included in Wikipedia, the article would need to have all its claims supported by reliable second-party sources.  The company's own website, although it can be used as a source for basic facts, cannot be used as a source to establish notability.  Read Notability and WP:Verifiability for more information.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 23:42, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. No sources to support notability. JNW (talk) 01:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete. The products and technologies have been removed from the page, and a source (dan & bradstreet) was added to establish notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.150.25.210 (talk) 11:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment A one line directory listing does not establish notability. noq (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: just not notable.  Dewritech (talk)  21:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.