Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ Rekha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

RJ Rekha

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

RJ Rekha

Non-notable radio disk jockey. Naïve Google search shows that she exists, and that she has this Wikipedia page. (It is not clear why the page is indexed.) This article was moved back from article space to draft space by User:Spiderone with the edit summary, "Not a single reliable source used". It was then moved back to article space. It still has two unreliable sources, YouTube and IMDB, and no reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fancruft. Fails WP:BIO Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: the article has been created as a reduced copy of the page (and with no additions) that existed earlier at the same title. In the earlier version, it had started as a draft by the same creator, moved to article space, tagged for WP:G11 by, and deleted by as G11 and WP:A7.  Jay (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - strongly support deletion. No reliable sources present which is unacceptable for a WP:BLP. I sent this to draft space so that, if sourcing does exist, it would give the creator the time to find appropriate sources and cite them. Given that it's been edit warred back I presume the creator wants us to assess the case as is. I have complied with WP:BEFORE anyway and found nothing better than her own social media. Even her social media profiles don't make any real argument for notability, with very low follower counts on all. I found her CV at Voice Artistes but this won't help the article's cause. Probably WP:A7 worthy. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable radio/television personality. No GNG-worthy sources found in BEFORE search, in both Hindi and English. -- Ab207 (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable yet in their career. I hope one day, new editors will realize that moving an article to Draft space is saving them from being quickly deleted, where they will have time to improve the article, not a punishment. Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - aside from not being notable, was created by a UPE/COI editor.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promotional. Deb (talk) 09:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.