Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RMA Gold Airways


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

RMA Gold Airways

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:CORP and these articles sum it up  "Only a few problems stand in the way. Gold Air has no aircraft, no air operator's certificate, no launch date and no major financial backers." Russavia 12:47, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite for NPOV. This company may be a laughable scam, but the fact that it has attracted genuine media coverage is itself evidence that it meets WP:CORP.--Yannick 17:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a strange one. The articles provided by the nom  and  are actually secondary reliable sources written primarily about this topic.  Just that this venture is, as of yet, failing has made this company notable.  It needs to be written in a NPOV perspective, though.  It looks like a press release currently. --Oakshade 19:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - agree with Oakshade that nom is based on an misunderstanding of Notability, and is fatally flawed. Dhaluza 19:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep only after the sources are provided in the article -- the relevant information at this point is only in the Afd; the article as it stands would justify a speedy as G11, advertising. DGG (talk) 02:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.