Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RNA Mirage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

RNA Mirage

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:N, no significant coverage in neutral third party sources. Galactic Traveller (talk) 06:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Normally media dont write entire article for building unless some activities like terrorist attack/fire etc. But its 40flr building and quite land mark on worli skyline, see RNA Mirage Pic1 Pic2 Pic3. also it been showed in many movie(bollywood), ads etc as skyline of Mumbai. In India 40flr building is still notable. Also it has some nice shape than usual square building which make its pretty notable in skyline. I also added reference to article.  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 11:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: From your userpage I can see you live in Mumbai, so you may have some emotional/nationalistic feelings about a project in your city/locality. This can be proved from your comment "its 40flr building and quite land mark on worli skyline" and "In India 40flr building is still notable". This is English Wikipedia, an international project, not Hindi Wikipedia or Indopedia. So notability should be judged from a global perspective. Considering the international standard, this building is nothing but a humble dwarf. And you still failed to establish notability. Out of the four references you added, the first is an advertisement for the project and fails WP:RS. The last is a nationalistic website without any editorial board, hence it fails the criteria of WP:RS. The only source which meets the criteria of WP:RS is the TOI article, but then again the article about about projects in Mumbai, not about this building, and it has only a brief coverage about the building which looks promotional for the purpose of making potential home buyers aware of the project. This interview looks like a weak source. So are we going to keep an article only because it has received a brief promotional coverage in the city section of an Indian daily? I don't think it is enough to establish notability. And your argumentation "it been showed in many movie(bollywood)" is irrelevant, in that sense we should have articles about all the buildings shown in Hollywood movies. Cheers. --Galactic Traveller (talk) 15:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * @Galactic Traveller: Please be aware of WP:NICE, there is no need to use offensive language. --Elekhh (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * @Kuwar: your explanation claims three potential areas of notability: architecture (buildig design), urban design (skyline) and popular culture (film), yet no evidence for any of these is provided. --Elekhh (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence of architectural notability at this stage. --Elekhh (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * Keep or merge into "Tallest buildings in India" etc. It's somewhat interesting and probably notable information that the 4th tallest building in all of India is 40 stories tall. 61.7.120.132 (talk) 06:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Source it or lose it folks. Spartaz Humbug! 05:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.